Articles #co production

This article explores why children in residential care must be meaningfully involved in the plans that shape their lives-beyond tokenistic “wishes and feelings” exercises. It links good practice to the legal and regulatory framework (Children Act 1989, UNCRC Article 12, and Regulation 7), and argues that co-authored plans are more likely to be understood, trusted, and followed. Practical examples show how involvement should run through admission, daily routines, key work, and reviews, with formats tailored to the child. The piece also addresses the tension between a homely environment and heavy documentation, recommending transparency, recording after conversations (not during), and offering children real options to contribute in their own words.